tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post3166814316754690096..comments2023-09-15T16:21:31.980+05:30Comments on INDIAN CORPORATE LAW: The Court of Appeal on the 'Entire Contract Doctrine'Umakanth Varottilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12438677982004444359noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post-40632336853549925952011-11-23T14:00:04.968+05:302011-11-23T14:00:04.968+05:30Mr. Panikkar has misunderstood the "entire co...Mr. Panikkar has misunderstood the "entire contract" doctrine - Section 39 as interpreted by the Courts is in line with English law and does not mandate an "entire contract" doctrine as a rule of law.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post-64501828539200971392011-11-22T12:54:18.094+05:302011-11-22T12:54:18.094+05:30The 'entire contract doctrine" is embodie...The 'entire contract doctrine" is embodied in Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. the S.39 reads:<br /><br />"39. Effect of refusal of party to perform promise wholly <br />When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing, his promise in its entirety, the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified, by words or conduct, his acquiescence in its continuance."Mohan Panikkarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10539544645442025135noreply@blogger.com