tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post4201204607813018373..comments2023-09-15T16:21:31.980+05:30Comments on INDIAN CORPORATE LAW: The Singapore Court of Appeal's Important Judgment in AstroUmakanth Varottilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12438677982004444359noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post-15572186851507593232013-11-17T15:46:35.984+05:302013-11-17T15:46:35.984+05:30Some Thoughts to Share:
What appears to have been ...Some Thoughts to Share:<br />What appears to have been covered at some length is the view the domestic court has taken.In doing so, the impression given is that some of the rules on international arbitration; which , to one's understanding are to be found in what is referred to as the Model Law. Even so, one is not clear, hence requires to be elaborated, as to how far / to what extent any such view of a domestic court could be effectively and finally enforced against a disputing party who is an alien to the country over which the domestic court has jurisdiction. In other words, the grave doubt is centered on the more serious issue often faced with; that is, to be precise, the concept , replete with complicity- comprehensively referred to as "extra territorial jurisdiction".<br />May be, any law expert well /reasonably versed and exposed to principles governing international arbitration, more particularly with personal experience of practice in international court (s) should could offhand throw some light, even though not any firm opinion.<br />Believe to have made self clear on the point of genuine doubt likely to arise in the mind of anyone else similarly placed.<br />vswaminoreply@blogger.com