tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post6310754812164318778..comments2023-09-15T16:21:31.980+05:30Comments on INDIAN CORPORATE LAW: The Options Saga ContinuesUmakanth Varottilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12438677982004444359noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post-70552064826424287412012-01-11T09:47:29.536+05:302012-01-11T09:47:29.536+05:30@vswami > "prefer to act independently, wi...@vswami > "prefer to act independently, with no scope for any meeting point" - to please be read - "prefer to co-ordinate and act in unison, with scope for any meeting point"vswaminoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3202774368551476669.post-30479466384455433652012-01-11T07:58:01.095+05:302012-01-11T07:58:01.095+05:30*Monday, October 31, 2011
Reversal of FDI Policy o...*Monday, October 31, 2011<br />Reversal of FDI Policy on Options<br />http://vswaminathan-vswaminathan-swamilook.blogspot.com/2011/11/bl-1st-nov-httpwww.html<br />>”POINT TO PONDER:<br />ARE THE 2 VIEWS AIRED, AS HIGHLIGHTED, MUTUALLY DIVERGENT OR COMPATIBLE ? > IT IS FOR 'EXPERTS' TO ELUCIDATE, IN ORDER TO BRING ABOUT CLARITY FOR A NON-EXPERT TO UNDERSTAND.” <br />Going back to the earlier Post*, as per a non-expert's perception/ limited understanding, the point of poser is seen to have found an answer in the subject Post! It bears on its sleeves the reality that, more often than not, no two authorities, in exercise of their own individual powers in regard to even any vital 'policy' matter, prefer to act independently, with no scope for any meeting point; that is, not see 'eye to eye'. The outcome /consequence, from the investors' point of view could only be, - confusion worse confounded.vswaminoreply@blogger.com